Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | harodt | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Golgari Midrange | xelz | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | squee_goblin_nabob | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Unknown Archetype | don_goto1990 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Golgari Graveyard | foodplz | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Legends , 4 Color Repurposing , 5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Doubling , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Abzan Roots , Domain Zur Overlords
Meta Performance Analysis
Llanowar Wastes ranks #340 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Llanowar Wastes is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 31.62 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Llanowar Wastes has a win rate of 64.8%, making it 6.0% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blanchwood Prowler | Creature — Elemental | 14 | 68.0% | 5 |
| Vinereap Mentor | Creature — Squirrel Druid | 8 | 67.9% | 3 |
| Urborg Lhurgoyf | Creature — Lhurgoyf | 13 | 65.5% | 4 |
| Glistening Deluge | Sorcery | 12 | 62.1% | 4 |
| Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 15 | 62.0% | 4 |
| Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 7 | 58.6% | 2 |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 6 | 58.3% | 3 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 37 | 57.7% | 10 |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 8 | 57.5% | 3 |
| Stab | Instant | 35 | 56.5% | 7 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Llanowar Wastes than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The End | Instant | 4 | 7 | 78.8% | 67.3% | +11.5% |
| Scavenging Ooze | Creature — Ooze | 2 | 7 | 75.0% | 67.6% | +7.4% |
| Glissa Sunslayer | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Zombie Elf | 3 | 8 | 78.8% | 71.8% | +7.0% |
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 10 | 75.0% | 69.6% | +5.4% |
| Debris Beetle | Artifact — Vehicle | 4 | 7 | 70.3% | 67.5% | +2.7% |
| Choking Miasma | Sorcery | 3 | 19 | 70.0% | 67.4% | +2.6% |
| Cease/Desist | Instant // Sorcery | 8 | 6 | 62.5% | 60.2% | +2.3% |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 12 | 69.2% | 66.9% | +2.3% |
| Virtue of Persistence | Enchantment // Sorcery — Adventure | 7 | 7 | 64.9% | 62.6% | +2.2% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 37 | 69.0% | 67.1% | +1.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | 766 | 99.0% | 44.1% |
| Golgari Demons | 545 | 100.0% | 46.9% |
| Golgari Graveyard | 52 | 96.3% | 41.9% |
| Unknown Archetype | 28 | 8.9% | 38.1% |
| Golgari Roots | 25 | 100.0% | 27.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.